«» HOME «»
ASEAN PORTS ASSOCIATION
PORT
SAFETY, HEALTH, ENVIRONMENT AND SECURITY
November 2005
ASEAN PORTS ASSOCIATION
BEST PRACTICES MANUAL ON
PORT SAFETY, HEALTH,
ENVIRONMENT AND SECURITY
The information contained in this document is solely for the use of the ASEAN Ports Association (APA) for the purpose for which it was prepared. The APA Permanent Secretariat takes no responsibility for inaccurate or incomplete information that may have been submitted to it. The facts published indicate the result of inquiries conducted and no warranty as to their accuracy is given by the APA Permanent Secretariat.
Published by the Permanent
Secretariat of the ASEAN Ports Association, Philippine Ports Authority, Marsman
Building, South Harbor, Port Area,
© 2005 APA Permanent Secretariat
FOREWORD
This reference material, one in a series of APA port
practices manuals, is the fruition of the collaborative efforts of the 25th
APA Main Meeting held in 1999 in Bali, Indonesia. It is APAs intent to draft a
manual that would provide a guide for internationally accepted best practices
for port safety, health, environment and security, as they are adopted and
applied in APA member-ports.
Responses indicated on the customized survey questionnaire, which underwent several amendments to address identified survey lapses, served as groundworks in the preparation of the manual. A total of 56 respondent ports/terminals from the seven APA member-countries, namely: Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam and Philippines, have accorded the time and effort to provide the needed data inputs. The survey also focused on policies, processes, procedures, rules and regulations, and documentation pertaining to port safety, health, environment and security.
In retrospect, the survey returns did not yield any definitive standards nor hard-and-fast rules on effective and efficient port management and/or service delivery. What needs to be taken within the proper perspective is that port efficiency and productivity are the product of the optimum utilization of resources and capabilities available to the port administrator or manager, which may be characterize only a particular area and would largely be influenced by the philosophies and attitudes of the stakeholders concerned.
In view of the foregoing, it was, thus, decided and agreed upon during the 28th APA Main Meeting, held in 2002 in Singapore, for the APA Permanent Secretariat to simply proceed for the time being with the compilation, analysis and presentation of the canvassed results as captured through the latest survey instruments. The Permanent Secretariat has committed, in the future, to come up with a more refined and comprehensive manual, which may serve as general reference or guidepost for a wide range of users/readers, especially those affiliated with the maritime industry.
The benefit this manual can offer can only be derived relative to the objectives and purposes of the user. Further improvements can be incorporated into this text to address a broad spectrum of port information needs of APA member-ports. Be that as it may, this undertaking is a continuing process that will document what would be considered from a common perspective the best and the exemplary in ASEAN practices with regard to port safety, health, environment and security.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This report was prepared by the Permanent Secretariat of the ASEAN Ports Association which would like to acknowledge the following agencies, groups and individuals:
BRUNEI
DARUSSALAM
1. Ports Department
1. Sihanoukville Autonomous Port
IPC I
1. Belawan
IPC II
1.
2. Panjang
3. Panjang/UTPK
4.
5. Tanjung Priok/PTJICT
6. Tanjung Priok/General Cargo
IPC III
1. Tanjung Perak
2.
1.
Port Klang Authority (PA)
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sabah Ports Authority
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. Northport (Malaysia) Bhd
11. Klang Multi Terminal
12. Johore Port Bhd
13. Penang Port Bhd
14. Kuantan Port Consortium
15.
Bintulu Port Bhd
16.
1. Sule
2. Bo Aung Kyaw
3. Hteedan
1.
Port Management Office of Ozamis
2.
Port Management Office of Puerto Princesa
3.
Port Management Office of
4.
Port Management Office of Tagbilaran
5.
Port Management Office of Pulupandan
6.
Port Management Office of
7.
Port Management Office of Limay
8.
Port Management Office of Tacloban
9.
Port Management Office of Nasipit
10. Port Management Office of
Cotabato
11. Port Management Office of
Legazpi
12. Port Management Office of
Cagayan de Oro
13. Port Management Office of
General Santos
14. Port Management Office of
15. Port Management Office of
16. Port Management Office of
Surigao
17. Port Management Office of
Iligan
18. Port Management Office of
Zamboanga
19. Port Management Office of
Dumaguete
20. Asian Terminals, Inc.
(Batangas)
21. International Container
Terminal Services, Inc. (ICTSI)
22. Cebu
Port Authority
1. Port of Singapore Authority
Corporation Limited
2.
1.
2. Laem Chabang Port/TIPS
3. Eastern Sea Laem Chabang
Terminal Co., Inc.
4. LCB Container Terminal
1.
2. Baria Serece
3.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND . .. 1
II. DEFINITION OF BEST PRACTICE . 2
III. BEST PRACTICES . . . 3
A. Policy On Safety, Health and Environment . . 3
B. Safety Organization .. ... 4
C. Safety Rules/Procedures/Practices . 5
D. Planned Safety Inspections . .. 8
E. Safety Enforcement . 10
F. Accident And Incident Investigation. . 11
G. Safety Audit . . 12
H. Safety Training . 15
I. Safety Promotion . 16
J. Maintenance Program . 16
K. Security . . 17
IV. APPENDICES
A. Survey Questionnaire On Port Safety, Health, Environment and Security (February 2002 version)
B. Results Of The Survey On Port Safety, Health, Environment and Security
ABBREVIATIONS / ACRONYMS
1. APA - ASEAN Ports Association
2.
ASEAN - Association of Southeast Asian Nations
3.
ATI - Asian Terminals, Incorporated
4.
CCTV - Closed Circuit Television
5.
DENR - Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (
6.
ICTSI - International Container Terminal Services,
Inc.
7.
IMDG - International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code
8.
IMO - International Maritime Organization
9.
ISO - International Standards Organization or
International Organization for Standardization (ISO is a word, not an
abbreviation, derived from the Greek isos meaning equal as in isometric
and isonomy.)
10.
JPPL - Jurong Port Pte Ltd.
11.
12.
MARPOL - Marine Pollution convention or International Convention for the
Prevention of Pollution from Ships
13.
MICT - Manila International Container Terminal
14.
OHSES - Occupational Health, Safety, Environment
and Security Policy
15.
PCG - Philippine Coast Guard
16.
PDO - Port District Office (
17.
PMO - Port Management Office (
18.
PPA - Philippine Ports Authority
19.
PSA -
20.
PUNSS - Port Users Needs and Satisfaction Survey
DEFINITION OF TERMS
1. Port
Authority - the port management body that is vested
by the State with the authority to oversee the ports within a specified area of
jurisdiction.
3. Port
Contractor - any government
or private entity, individual or company that is granted by the State or Port
Authority, as the case may be, with the permit or license to provide services
in a port, usually related to infrastructure development.
4. Port
Operator - any government or private entity,
individual or company that is granted by the State or Port Authority, as the
case may be, with the permit or license to operate the port and provide other
related services.
5. Port
Owner - any government or private entity,
individual or company that has the legal entitlement or proprietorship of the
port.
6. Terminal Operator - any government or private entity, individual or company that is granted by the State or Port Authority, as the case may be, with the permit or license to operate the terminal in a port and provide other related services.
BEST PRACTICES MANUAL ON
PORT SAFETY, HEALTH,
ENVIRONMENT AND SECURITY
I. INTRODUCTION
Background
In its 25th Main Meeting held on
A draft survey questionnaire was prepared in early 2000 to generate the information necessary for the preparation of the manual. After undergoing several revisions/amendments, the finalized form of the questionnaire was disseminated to ports of APA member-countries in February 2001. The accomplished forms were processed by the APA Permanent Secretariat in May of the same year.
The survey did not yield sufficient data needed for the manual. Among the major problems encountered in the analysis of the responses were incomplete or unrelated responses and unanswered questions.
The results of the February 2001 Survey were presented and
discussed in the 22nd APA Technical Committee Meeting held in
Fifty-six (56) ports/terminals from the following seven APA member-countries responded to the February 2002 survey questionnaire:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Total 60
The respondents were categorized and distributed as follows:
1. Port Authority 35 58 %
2. Terminal operator 4 7
3. Port operator 12 20
4. Port contractor 2 3